“It was Donald Trump’s words, it was his motivation, it was his anger that caused what occurred on January 6 in your amazing and beautiful city,” Hassan said. “They want to use Enrique Tarrio as a scapegoat for Donald Trump and those in power.”
Hassan kicked off the second day of closing arguments in the trial, one of the most high-profile of the nearly 1,000 Jan. 6 cases the government has charged. If convicted, Tarrio will be the first person held partially responsible for the Jan. 6 riot who was not at the Capitol that day.
Hassan started his closing argument by quoting President Franklin D. Roosevelt and ended by quoting the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., both on the importance of protecting the rights of the few as well as the majority.
“If you don’t stand up to the government now as justice requires and the Constitution requires, the next time they may come for you,” Hassan said.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Conor Mulroe told jurors a day earlier that the Proud Boys saw themselves as Trump’s army, turning the president’s words into violent action. Hassan called that “ludicrous,” pointing out that federal law enforcement found no evidence that Tarrio told members to attack the Capitol or made plans for how they could do so. Instead, the government relied on Tarrio’s encouragement during and after the riot, along with ambiguous comments he made in advance — including references to a plan for occupying government buildings called “1776 Returns” given to the Proud Boys leader by a girlfriend.
Tarrio was arrested two days before Jan. 6 after being accused of burning a church’s Black Lives Matter flag during a December protest in Washington. Just before he was taken into custody, he told one of the other defendants that “whatever happens” they should “make it a spectacle.” After the Capitol was overrun, Tarrio posted on the app Parler that people inside the building shouldn’t leave; after the riot, he messaged other Proud Boys leaders: “Make no mistake … we did this.”
Mulroe argued that the “spectacle” comment was an instruction to unleash violence when members of Congress would certify the 2020 election results, and that Tarrio’s references to 1776 were “shorthand” for “violent revolution.” Hassan said Tarrio was just telling Proud Boys to make noise about his arrest and that his “over the top” social media comments should be understood as bluster.
“Enrique was an entertainer, a lover and a razzle-dazzler,” Hassan said. Tarrio, who was released on Jan. 5 and ordered out of the city, watched the Capitol riot on television from a hotel in Baltimore. It’s “ludicrous,” Hassan said, to believe “he knew everything that was going to happen on Jan. 6 from a hotel miles away.”
Hassan emphasized that from November through January Tarrio corresponded regularly with Shane Lamond, a D.C. police lieutenant in charge of intelligence. Lamond is now under investigation for his relationship with Tarrio, which Hassan called “shameful.” Lamond shared information he got from Tarrio with the police department and federal agencies, but he also appeared to give the Proud Boys leader warnings about law enforcement activity. Based on his conversations with Tarrio, Lamond told the D.C. police that there would be an “extremely small” group of Proud Boys in Washington on Jan. 6 and that reports of mobilization for violence were “totally fake news.”
Hassan said the lieutenant was telling the truth: Tarrio had organized no effort to bring large numbers of Proud Boys to Washington. “Lamond could not provide useful info to the government,” he said, “so the government attacked Lamond.”
Two Proud Boys, one close to Tarrio, testified that they were part of a conspiracy to stop the peaceful transfer of power. Hassan dismissed both as lying to avoid responsibility. “It’s absurd for a grown man with a head on his shoulders, who understands right from wrong, to blame another man for his actions when that man, Enrique, wasn’t even here,” Hassan said.
